GONG Hui, HUANG Ding, ZHANG Xiang-yang. The Clinical Analysis of Protecting Side Branch with A Small Balloon in Treating Coronary Bifurcation LesionJ. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2017.03.011
Citation:
GONG Hui, HUANG Ding, ZHANG Xiang-yang. The Clinical Analysis of Protecting Side Branch with A Small Balloon in Treating Coronary Bifurcation LesionJ. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2017.03.011
GONG Hui, HUANG Ding, ZHANG Xiang-yang. The Clinical Analysis of Protecting Side Branch with A Small Balloon in Treating Coronary Bifurcation LesionJ. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2017.03.011
Citation:
GONG Hui, HUANG Ding, ZHANG Xiang-yang. The Clinical Analysis of Protecting Side Branch with A Small Balloon in Treating Coronary Bifurcation LesionJ. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2017, 17(3): 159-162. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2017.03.011
The Clinical Analysis of Protecting Side Branch with A Small Balloon in Treating Coronary Bifurcation Lesion
No content published by the Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine may be reproduced or abridged without authorization. Please do not use or copy the layout and design of the journal without permission.
All articles published represent the opinions of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy of the Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine’ Sponsors or the Editorial Board, unless this is clearly specified.
Objective To explore the clinical value of implanting a DES (drug eluting stent)in main vessel and dilating a small external diameter balloon in side branch in treating coronary bifurcation lesion. Methods Forty-eight patients who underwent this intervention strategy were retrospectively observed to study its short-term effectiveness and safety. Results The angiographic effectiveness was as follow: Before the operation the degree of main vessel’s stenosis was (86.80%±9.10%), while the degree of main vessel’s stenosis was (0.20%±0.80%) after the operation (Z=-6.08,P<0.01). Before the operation the degree of side branch’s stenosis was (67.10%±20.00%), while the degree of side branch stenosis was (27.30%±18.20%) after the operation (Z=-5.99, P<0.01). The clinical effectiveness was as follow: No MACEs happened during the operation in this study. The safety was as follow: When the main vessel sent balloon was dilated in (15.10±1.80) atm and the side branch small balloon was dilated in (10.00±2.70) atm, the jailed small balloon and guide-wire in the side branch could be removed smoothly. Conclusion The instant effectiveness and safety of implanting a DES in main vessel and dilating a small balloon in side branch in treating coronary bifurcation lesion is good. But its long-term effectiveness and safety is worth studying further.